mirror of
https://bitbucket.org/siakitem/my-pi.git
synced 2026-08-28 08:35:57 +00:00
225 lines
7.4 KiB
TypeScript
225 lines
7.4 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import type { AuthorizerVerdict } from "#src/authority/authorizer";
|
|
import { composeAuthorizerChain } from "#src/authority/authorizer-chain";
|
|
import type { PermissionPromptDecision } from "#src/authority/permission-dialog";
|
|
import type { PromptPermissionDetails } from "#src/authority/permission-prompter";
|
|
import type { AuthorizerLog, PermissionQuery } from "#src/service";
|
|
import { makeAuthorizerLog } from "#test/helpers/authorizer-log-fixtures";
|
|
import { DECIDED_BY_HUMAN } from "#test/helpers/decision-fixtures";
|
|
import { makePromptDetails as makeDetails } from "#test/helpers/prompt-details-fixtures";
|
|
|
|
/** A shared review-log seam; identity-comparable for injection assertions. */
|
|
const log = makeAuthorizerLog();
|
|
|
|
// ── Helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
/** A narrow PermissionQuery stub; identity-comparable for injection assertions. */
|
|
function makeQuery(): PermissionQuery {
|
|
return {
|
|
checkPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
getToolPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* A terminal stub returning a fixed decision; exposes the vi.fn for assertions.
|
|
*
|
|
* The default is filler for the tests that assert the terminal is never
|
|
* reached; a test whose subject is the terminal's own decision passes one.
|
|
*/
|
|
function makeTerminal(
|
|
decision: PermissionPromptDecision = {
|
|
approved: true,
|
|
state: "approved",
|
|
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
authorize: vi
|
|
.fn<
|
|
(details: PromptPermissionDetails) => Promise<PermissionPromptDecision>
|
|
>()
|
|
.mockResolvedValue(decision),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** A non-terminal link stub returning a fixed verdict, under a given name. */
|
|
function makeLink(verdict: AuthorizerVerdict, name = "link") {
|
|
return {
|
|
name,
|
|
authorize: vi
|
|
.fn<
|
|
(
|
|
details: PromptPermissionDetails,
|
|
query: PermissionQuery,
|
|
log: AuthorizerLog,
|
|
) => Promise<AuthorizerVerdict>
|
|
>()
|
|
.mockResolvedValue(verdict),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Tests ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("composeAuthorizerChain", () => {
|
|
it("returns the terminal instance itself when there are no links", () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal();
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
|
|
|
|
// Identity is a behavioral invariant: escalate hands the real terminal to
|
|
// the prompter, so `expect.any(LocalUserAuthorizer)` still holds.
|
|
expect(composed).toBe(terminal);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("maps an allow verdict to an approved decision and injects the query", async () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal({
|
|
approved: false,
|
|
state: "denied",
|
|
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
|
|
});
|
|
const link = makeLink({ kind: "allow" }, "model-judge");
|
|
const query = makeQuery();
|
|
const details = makeDetails();
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, query, log);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(details);
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual({
|
|
approved: true,
|
|
state: "approved",
|
|
decidedBy: {
|
|
kind: "authorizer",
|
|
name: "model-judge",
|
|
verdict: "allow",
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
// The chain injects the session-scoped query and the review-log seam into
|
|
// each link (ADR 0007 §3).
|
|
expect(link.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details, query, log);
|
|
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("maps a deny verdict with a reason to a denied_with_reason decision", async () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal();
|
|
const link = makeLink(
|
|
{ kind: "deny", reason: "wrong path; use pi-packages" },
|
|
"model-judge",
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual({
|
|
approved: false,
|
|
state: "denied_with_reason",
|
|
denialReason: "wrong path; use pi-packages",
|
|
decidedBy: {
|
|
kind: "authorizer",
|
|
name: "model-judge",
|
|
verdict: "deny",
|
|
reason: "wrong path; use pi-packages",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("maps a deny verdict without a reason to a plain denied decision", async () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal();
|
|
const link = makeLink({ kind: "deny" }, "guard");
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual({
|
|
approved: false,
|
|
state: "denied",
|
|
decidedBy: {
|
|
kind: "authorizer",
|
|
name: "guard",
|
|
verdict: "deny",
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("falls through a defer verdict to the terminal", async () => {
|
|
const terminalDecision: PermissionPromptDecision = {
|
|
approved: false,
|
|
state: "denied",
|
|
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
|
|
confirmationUnavailable: true,
|
|
};
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal(terminalDecision);
|
|
const link = makeLink({ kind: "defer" });
|
|
const query = makeQuery();
|
|
const details = makeDetails();
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, query, log);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(details);
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual(terminalDecision);
|
|
expect(link.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details, query, log);
|
|
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("tries links in order and the first non-defer verdict wins", async () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal();
|
|
const first = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "first");
|
|
const second = makeLink({ kind: "deny", reason: "no" }, "second");
|
|
const third = makeLink({ kind: "allow" }, "third");
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
|
|
[first, second, third],
|
|
terminal,
|
|
makeQuery(),
|
|
log,
|
|
);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
|
|
|
|
// The deciding link is named, not merely the consulted set: a deferring
|
|
// link ahead of it decided nothing and must not be credited.
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual({
|
|
approved: false,
|
|
state: "denied_with_reason",
|
|
denialReason: "no",
|
|
decidedBy: {
|
|
kind: "authorizer",
|
|
name: "second",
|
|
verdict: "deny",
|
|
reason: "no",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(third.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reaches the terminal when every link defers", async () => {
|
|
const terminal = makeTerminal({
|
|
approved: true,
|
|
state: "approved",
|
|
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
|
|
});
|
|
const first = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "first");
|
|
const second = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "second");
|
|
|
|
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
|
|
[first, second],
|
|
terminal,
|
|
makeQuery(),
|
|
log,
|
|
);
|
|
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
|
|
|
|
// The terminal's own decision passes through unchanged — a link that
|
|
// deferred is not the decider.
|
|
expect(decision).toEqual({
|
|
approved: true,
|
|
state: "approved",
|
|
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|