mirror of
https://bitbucket.org/siakitem/my-pi.git
synced 2026-08-28 08:35:57 +00:00
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
issue, issue_title
| issue | issue_title |
|---|---|
| 1 | Add integration tests for external_directory tool_call enforcement |
Retro: #1 — Add integration tests for external_directory tool_call enforcement
Final Retrospective (2026-05-08T17:36:00-06:00)
Session summary
Planned, implemented, and shipped 35 integration tests for the external_directory tool_call enforcement gate in 5 TDD cycles.
No production code was changed.
The session covered /plan-issue, /tdd-plan, and /ship-issue with one minor plan re-commit (MD060 table separator) and one Edit mismatch after autoformat.
Observations
What went well
- The plan-to-TDD-to-ship pipeline executed end-to-end in a single session with zero rework on production code.
- The surface-aware
makeCheckPermissionhelper cleanly isolated theexternal_directorygate from the tool gate, making each test focused and readable. - All 5 TDD cycles passed on first run (no red→debug loops needed), indicating the plan's test matrix was well-scoped against the existing architecture.
What caused friction (agent side)
instruction-violation— Used|---|---|---|table separators in the plan instead of| --- | --- |required by MD060 compact style. Themarkdown-conventionsskill was loaded and documents this rule. Impact: one failed pre-commit hook, one fixup edit, one re-commit. Self-identified (caught by hook, not user).missing-context— In cycle 2, attempted anEditusing pre-autoformatoldTextafter Biome had reformatted the file (specificallyit.each(OPTIONAL_PATH_TOOLS)(was reflowed). Impact: one failedEditcall, onetailread to get actual text, then successful edit. Added ~10 seconds of friction, no rework.
What caused friction (user side)
- None observed. The user's issue was detailed with an explicit test matrix, acceptance criteria, and suggested implementation approach, which made planning straightforward.