Files
my-pi/pi-permission-system/test/authority/authorizer-chain.test.ts
T
云服务部-叶林立andDevin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> 7e6a8faae1 feat(pi-permission-system): AutoReview 改为跟随主模型的对话式工具调用审查
AutoReview:

- 审查器回到 Codex Guardian 风格的对话式审查,默认跟随会话当前主模型
  (每次审查实时读取 ctx.model);provider/model 必须同时设置才固定审查
  模型,只设其一视为配置错误并转人工。
- 结论只通过 approve / reject 两个工具给出,参数仅 reason;不强制
  toolChoice,正文文本(即使是合法 JSON)一律忽略。
- approve 自动放行;reject 转人工并在弹窗显示理由(标注模型生成)。
  超时、Provider 错误、截断、未调用工具、多次调用、参数无效等异常同样
  转人工,并附固定的系统说明;用户按 Esc 中止时直接拒绝。
- 模型调用改为 modelRegistry.streamSimple(...).result():Pi 1.3.0 面向
  扩展的 ModelRegistry 没有 completeSimple,原写法在真实环境中每次都会
  转人工。
- 对话记录保留可信度标注;工具结果在有更短的 pi-compaction 摘要时替换
  为摘要;token 估算改为非 ASCII 字符按 1 token 计;预算可配置。
- 同一条用户消息内完全相同的请求只缓存 approve 结论。
- 默认 reasoning low、总超时 30 秒、最多 2 次尝试、maxOutputTokens 4000。

删除:

- 未发布过的 TypeSafe Jev 分类器实现、DenialCircuitBreaker。
- 整个 annotator 机制(model-explanation、注册表、registerAnnotator、
  provider-timeout);annotators 配置键保留为已弃用并忽略,避免旧配置
  被拒绝。

测试:

- 新增 reviewer / transcript / 弹窗说明 / 默认配置测试;清理重复、恒真
  或只测实现细节的旧测试。
- 使用 deepseek-v4.1-flash 实测 5 个场景各 5 次,25 次结论全部符合预期。

Generated with [Devin](https://devin.ai)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-19 01:54:17 -07:00

294 lines
9.4 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import type { AuthorizerVerdict } from "#src/authority/authorizer";
import { composeAuthorizerChain } from "#src/authority/authorizer-chain";
import type { PermissionPromptDecision } from "#src/authority/permission-dialog";
import type { PromptPermissionDetails } from "#src/authority/permission-prompter";
import type { AuthorizerLog, PermissionQuery } from "#src/service";
import { makeAuthorizerLog } from "#test/helpers/authorizer-log-fixtures";
import { DECIDED_BY_HUMAN } from "#test/helpers/decision-fixtures";
import { makePromptDetails as makeDetails } from "#test/helpers/prompt-details-fixtures";
/** A shared review-log seam; identity-comparable for injection assertions. */
const log = makeAuthorizerLog();
// ── Helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
/** A narrow PermissionQuery stub; identity-comparable for injection assertions. */
function makeQuery(): PermissionQuery {
return {
checkPermission: vi.fn(),
getToolPermission: vi.fn(),
};
}
/**
* A terminal stub returning a fixed decision; exposes the vi.fn for assertions.
*
* The default is filler for the tests that assert the terminal is never
* reached; a test whose subject is the terminal's own decision passes one.
*/
function makeTerminal(
decision: PermissionPromptDecision = {
approved: true,
state: "approved",
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
},
) {
return {
authorize: vi
.fn<
(details: PromptPermissionDetails) => Promise<PermissionPromptDecision>
>()
.mockResolvedValue(decision),
};
}
/** A non-terminal link stub returning a fixed verdict, under a given name. */
function makeLink(verdict: AuthorizerVerdict, name = "link") {
return {
name,
authorize: vi
.fn<
(
details: PromptPermissionDetails,
query: PermissionQuery,
log: AuthorizerLog,
) => Promise<AuthorizerVerdict>
>()
.mockResolvedValue(verdict),
};
}
// ── Tests ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe("composeAuthorizerChain", () => {
it("returns the terminal instance itself when there are no links", () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
// Identity is a behavioral invariant: escalate hands the real terminal to
// the prompter, so `expect.any(LocalUserAuthorizer)` still holds.
expect(composed).toBe(terminal);
});
it("maps an allow verdict to an approved decision and injects the query", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal({
approved: false,
state: "denied",
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
});
const link = makeLink({ kind: "allow" }, "model-judge");
const query = makeQuery();
const details = makeDetails();
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, query, log);
const decision = await composed.authorize(details);
expect(decision).toEqual({
approved: true,
state: "approved",
decidedBy: {
kind: "authorizer",
name: "model-judge",
verdict: "allow",
reason: null,
},
});
// The chain injects the session-scoped query and the review-log seam into
// each link (ADR 0007 §3).
expect(link.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details, query, log);
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("maps a deny verdict with a reason to a denied_with_reason decision", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const link = makeLink(
{ kind: "deny", reason: "wrong path; use pi-packages" },
"model-judge",
);
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
expect(decision).toEqual({
approved: false,
state: "denied_with_reason",
denialReason: "wrong path; use pi-packages",
decidedBy: {
kind: "authorizer",
name: "model-judge",
verdict: "deny",
reason: "wrong path; use pi-packages",
},
});
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("maps a deny verdict without a reason to a plain denied decision", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const link = makeLink({ kind: "deny" }, "guard");
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
expect(decision).toEqual({
approved: false,
state: "denied",
decidedBy: {
kind: "authorizer",
name: "guard",
verdict: "deny",
reason: null,
},
});
});
it("falls through a defer verdict to the terminal", async () => {
const terminalDecision: PermissionPromptDecision = {
approved: false,
state: "denied",
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
confirmationUnavailable: true,
};
const terminal = makeTerminal(terminalDecision);
const link = makeLink({ kind: "defer" });
const query = makeQuery();
const details = makeDetails();
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, query, log);
const decision = await composed.authorize(details);
expect(decision).toEqual(terminalDecision);
expect(link.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details, query, log);
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details);
});
it("tries links in order and the first non-defer verdict wins", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const first = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "first");
const second = makeLink({ kind: "deny", reason: "no" }, "second");
const third = makeLink({ kind: "allow" }, "third");
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
[first, second, third],
terminal,
makeQuery(),
log,
);
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
// The deciding link is named, not merely the consulted set: a deferring
// link ahead of it decided nothing and must not be credited.
expect(decision).toEqual({
approved: false,
state: "denied_with_reason",
denialReason: "no",
decidedBy: {
kind: "authorizer",
name: "second",
verdict: "deny",
reason: "no",
},
});
expect(third.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("reaches the terminal when every link defers", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal({
approved: true,
state: "approved",
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
});
const first = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "first");
const second = makeLink({ kind: "defer" }, "second");
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
[first, second],
terminal,
makeQuery(),
log,
);
const decision = await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
// The terminal's own decision passes through unchanged — a link that
// deferred is not the decider.
expect(decision).toEqual({
approved: true,
state: "approved",
decidedBy: DECIDED_BY_HUMAN,
});
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
});
it("collects defer notes and forwards them to the terminal on the details", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const details = makeDetails();
const first = makeLink(
{
kind: "defer",
note: { origin: "system", text: "fidelity uncertain" },
},
"first",
);
const second = makeLink(
{
kind: "defer",
note: { origin: "model", text: "user forbade it" },
},
"second",
);
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
[first, second],
terminal,
makeQuery(),
log,
);
await composed.authorize(details);
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
...details,
deferNotes: [
{ origin: "system", text: "fidelity uncertain" },
{ origin: "model", text: "user forbade it" },
],
});
});
it("passes the original details object when no link attached a note", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const details = makeDetails();
const link = makeLink({ kind: "defer" });
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain([link], terminal, makeQuery(), log);
await composed.authorize(details);
// Identity, not just equality: the details are not re-wrapped when there
// is nothing to attach.
expect(terminal.authorize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(details);
});
it("discards a deferring link's note when a later link decides", async () => {
const terminal = makeTerminal();
const first = makeLink(
{ kind: "defer", note: { origin: "system", text: "not sure" } },
"first",
);
const second = makeLink({ kind: "allow" }, "second");
const composed = composeAuthorizerChain(
[first, second],
terminal,
makeQuery(),
log,
);
await composed.authorize(makeDetails());
// The note only exists to inform a *deferred* prompt; a decided ask never
// reaches the terminal, so there is nothing to forward.
expect(terminal.authorize).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});