Files

167 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

# pi-chrome examples
Real, useful agent prompts. Drop any of these into Pi after running `/chrome onboard`, then `/chrome authorize`. Each one uses Chrome tabs and accounts you already have.
## Daily workflow
### PR triage
```text
Use chrome_tab list to find my GitHub notifications tab.
chrome_snapshot it. Group PRs by:
- awaiting my review
- blocked on me (changes requested back)
- mergeable (approved + green CI)
Output a 5-bullet ranked triage. Do not click anything.
```
### Linear standup
```text
Open my Linear current cycle in the active tab.
chrome_snapshot, then write yesterday/today/blockers
in the exact format my standup channel uses.
```
### Slack catch-up
```text
For each unread channel in my Slack tab, chrome_snapshot,
extract the top 3 messages that mention me or my team,
and summarize what I missed in <100 words total.
```
## Debugging
### Reproduce a customer bug with evidence
```text
1. chrome_navigate to https://staging.acme.com/orders/<id>
2. chrome_snapshot
3. Click "Refund" with chrome_click
4. Use chrome_list_network_requests to capture the API call
5. chrome_get_network_request on the failing one — give me the response body
6. chrome_screenshot the error state to ./repro/refund-bug.png
```
### Visual diff local vs staging
```text
chrome_screenshot http://localhost:3000/pricing → ./diff/local.png
chrome_screenshot https://staging.acme.com/pricing → ./diff/staging.png
Then read both, describe layout differences in plain English.
```
### Console + network forensics
```text
Reproduce the checkout bug on the active tab.
After the failure:
- chrome_list_console_messages
- chrome_list_network_requests
Cross-reference the timestamps and tell me what broke first.
```
## Admin / ops
### Multi-tab cross-check
```text
I have Stripe, Postmark, and our internal admin open in 3 tabs.
For user <id>, chrome_snapshot each tab in turn and find
any field where state disagrees. Output a 3-column table.
```
### Bulk gentle action (safe form-fill, no submit)
```text
Open our vendor portal "Add Vendor" form.
For each row in ./vendors.csv:
- chrome_fill the form
- chrome_screenshot it
- STOP before submit
- chrome_evaluate "history.back()" to return to the list
I will review screenshots and submit manually.
```
### Auth-only data pull
```text
My analytics dashboard is open and the cookie auth would die in headless mode.
chrome_evaluate to read window.__APP_STATE__.dashboardData
and dump today's KPIs as JSON.
```
## Demos / PRs
### Capture screenshots for a PR description
```text
On localhost:3000/feature-x:
- empty state → ./pr/01-empty.png
- filled state → ./pr/02-filled.png
- error state (delete the API key from devtools first) → ./pr/03-error.png
Save each with chrome_screenshot. Output a markdown block I can paste into the PR.
```
### Record a guided demo flow
```text
On my staging app:
1. Walk the new-onboarding flow start to finish
2. After each chrome_click or chrome_navigate, chrome_screenshot
3. Save numbered PNGs under ./demo/
4. Write narration captions for each step
```
## Forms with frameworks
### React controlled inputs
```text
Use `chrome_fill` for React inputs when you want to replace the full value.
Pass `includeSnapshot=true` to verify the component re-rendered with the new value.
```
### File upload without the native picker
```text
chrome_upload_file paths=[./fixtures/avatar.png] selector="input[type=file]"
# Uses Chrome file-input control. No native file picker opens.
```
### Drag-to-reorder lists
```text
chrome_drag fromUid=row-3 toUid=row-1
# Uses Chrome pointer drag through its input layer.
```
## Multi-session patterns
`pi-chrome` shares one bridge across all Pi sessions on the same machine. Useful patterns:
### Planner + Worker
- **Planner session** stays high level: "find the bug, decide the fix."
- **Worker session** runs the actual `chrome_*` tools.
- Both see the same Chrome state because they're both pointing at your real profile.
### Watcher
A third Pi session can run `chrome_snapshot` periodically in `background: true` mode and post summaries via `pi-qq` — handy for long-running flows.
## Chrome input
Interactive tools use Chrome's real input layer by default: clicks, typing, fill, keys, hover, drag, scroll, and touch. This is reliable for:
- sign-in flows
- guarded buttons
- audio/video controls
- fullscreen and other user-activation checks
- pages where DOM injection/evaluate is limited, if the agent can use screenshots + coordinates
Strict CSP note: `chrome_snapshot`/`chrome_evaluate` work even on pages that disallow `unsafe-eval`, because they run via CDP `Runtime.evaluate` (not page-level `eval`/`new Function`), which is not subject to page CSP. `chrome_screenshot`, tab/navigation tools, and real input also work under any CSP.
Chrome may show its debugger banner while pi-chrome is attached.